Back

Multipole Expansion: Exact vs Truncated Potential

Far enough away, any clump of charge stops looking complicated. Its potential can be written as a sum of simpler pieces: a monopole that falls off as one over distance, a dipole that falls as one over distance squared, a quadrupole as distance cubed, and so on, each weaker and shorter-ranged than the last. This is the multipole expansion, and it is why a distant galaxy is a point mass, a molecule is a dipole, and an antenna is designed term by term. The trick is that far from the cloud only the first non-zero term matters, so a neutral blob looks like a pure dipole and you can throw the rest away. Up close it is the opposite: you need many terms and the series barely helps. The scene shows the true potential of a small charge cluster with a probe you can move; the diagnostic plots how wrong each truncation is against distance, on a log-log scale where every extra term buys a steeper drop in the error.

Figure 1. Multipole expansion of the electrostatic potential. Top: the exact potential of a small charge cluster (colour map and contours) with a movable probe at distance r. Bottom: the relative error of the monopole, monopole-plus-dipole, and through-quadrupole truncations versus distance, on a log-log scale, with a steeper falloff for each added term. Method: Cartesian multipole expansion about the origin, V = K[Q/r + p.rhat/r^2 + ...].
clouddipole
keep to+dipole

WHAT TO TRY

  • Drag the probe far out: the truncated potential locks onto the exact one and the error plunges.
  • Keep only the monopole for the dipole cloud: the error sits near 100%, the net charge is zero so the leading term is useless.
  • Add the dipole, then the quadrupole term, and watch the error curve drop a whole power of distance steeper each time.
  • Switch clouds: each needs its own first non-zero term before the expansion starts to work.